Analysts Slashed Ratings on Municipal Bond Funds
Five Municipal Bond Funds Gets “Sell” Rating
Income investors are no stranger to municipal bonds. However, a major financial services firm just warned about the risk in closed-end funds (CEFs) of municipal bonds.
On Monday, August 15, Stifel Nicolaus analysts Alexander Reiss and Nick Cunningham cut their ratings on 17 different municipal bond closed end funds. Some of them, such as Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NYSE:NAC), Nuveen Massachusetts Premium Income Municipal Fund (NYSE:NMT), and Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II (NYSEMKT:VKI), were given “Sell” ratings. (Source: “Municipal Bonds: Time to Dump Those Closed End Funds?,” Barron’s, August 15, 2016.)
“The decline in long-term bond yields has amplified a search for yield,” the analysts wrote. “This has helped to fuel a rally in municipal bonds and even more so in the closed-end funds that own them.”
To be more specific, Reiss and Cunningham noted that the average municipal bond fund has generated a 6.68% net asset value (NAV) total return so far this year. The share prices of municipal bond funds have gained an average of 12.96% during this period.
The NAV return is the change in the net asset value of the fund. The NAV return of a fund can be different than the total return that investors realize because the funds can trade at a premium or a discount to the value of the assets held in the portfolio. This time, the rally in municipal bond funds seems to be much bigger than the rally in the bonds they hold.
According to Reiss and Cunningham, one of the catalysts behind the rally in those funds was uncertainty. Historically, the strong credit quality of municipal bond funds’ portfolios have provided defense against economic turmoil. Now, with lackluster economic growth and the recent Brexit vote result, these funds have gained renewed interest from investors.
“This run-up has made municipal funds less attractive in our eyes as potential headwinds begin to strengthen,” the analysts wrote. “Since markets tend to focus on ‘better’ or ‘worse,’ we believe several intensifying headwinds have the potential to lower near-term forward returns.”
Reiss and Cunningham listed three reasons why municipal bond funds have become less attractive this year: “1) bond portfolio holdings trading at premiums to par value, 2) shrinking fund shares price discounts to NAV, and 3) declining portfolio earnings and potential distribution cuts.” (Source: Ibid.)
Dear Reader: There is no magic formula to getting rich. Success in investment vehicles with the best prospects for price appreciation can only be achieved through proper and rigorous research and analysis. We are 100% independent in that we are not affiliated with any bank or brokerage house. Information contained herein, while believed to be correct, is not guaranteed as accurate. Warning: Investing often involves high risks and you can lose a lot of money. Please do not invest with money you cannot afford to lose. The opinions in this content are just that, opinions of the authors. We are a publishing company and the opinions, comments, stories, reports, advertisements and articles we publish are for informational and educational purposes only; nothing herein should be considered personalized investment advice. Before you make any investment, check with your investment professional (advisor). We urge our readers to review the financial statements and prospectus of any company they are interested in. We are not responsible for any damages or losses arising from the use of any information herein. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners
Sign up to receive our FREE Income Investors newsletter along with our special offers and get our FREE report:
5 Dividend Stocks to Own Forever
This is an entirely free service. No credit card required. You can opt-out at anytime.
We hate spam as much as you do.